Udemy does NOT do Feedback
Here I am going to comment on another constructive criticism to the people at Udemy, which is precisely when we are loading the courses in this case and this almost always happens to me every time I am creating a new course or in this case an update to a course, they almost always tell me the same thing that in a few words here is the text but what they are saying is that they do not like to put text on images, which well I usually consider to be fine:
It appears that your course image includes text. Udemy research has found that course images containing text are less successful. For this reason, we only allow text on course images in very limited cases, primarily in the context of a logo.
Please update the image by removing the text and resubmit your course as soon as possible.
For more information on our quality guidelines, please see this article:
For what is the promotion part of a course then we are going to see exactly what the situation is and right now I will give you a little critique then here I am going to come to the home page in this case it is for the Livewire course right now I am recording the inertia and the lightware which are the ones I am working on at the moment I remember that I do one on Windows in this case the inertia and the Livewire I left it for the Mac and that is why I manage them to date I uploaded the inertia a few days ago and now I am going to comment on that course and now we are with the lare which is the one from the critique that I received here 13 hours ago as you can see then the image is this one here appears js which is the logo of the people of ja although I do not know if it has a logo but anyway it is what I have found npm which is for note NPM, Livewire which is the name of the technology and here php as you can see here what I do already making a little bit of parentheses It is that for the logo I obviously put the main technology that is in the middle which is Laravel and the Livewire logo and around I put the related technologies like php npm well here I emphasize lightware here js here the iconit for alpin and what would be telwin so the person who wants to learn this obviously I hope that at least they know the logos and if not someone will be able to relate it and here they will be able to see it that is a bit of the joke of all this because.
In the end the issue of programming is that since they are interfaces and code to make a decent logo I think it costs a little bit you check the Udemy page and all the cover pages are horrible for what I mentioned I suppose for what refers to development so going back here to the udemy thing I suppose.
I think the criticism is about this, notice that I also received the same criticism with the inertia course here a few days ago when I published it if I open it here you will see that they wrote me exactly the same thing here you can see it and here is my response before continuing there we will see what the image is here by the way I did not put inertia I should put it here but it is similar here I have the one for Note and the one for php which would be again one of those are the ones that are criticizing me regardless of whether this image is a little different from this one Notice that they continue again emphasizing especially with Logos as well known as the one for npm for the note package manager which was the one they shrank and the one for php which this one has had for many years then they continue making the same criticism then here you can see the response that I give them in which I indicate that hey that is the node logo and the php logo that obviously I have to include there for the aforementioned And from there they gave it as completed you could seem all happy but.
Let's go a little further into the background, what is criticism itself, now that the situation is clear, the next thing I want to give is my opinion or constructive criticism towards the people at Udemy, which is precisely that these people, the Udemy team, do not give feedback, that is to say, here you can see what the term is in case you don't know it, which is to take a proportion of the output, understood as the output being the person who is uploading the course as part of the input to improve the process, understood as the input being the person who is testing or not the course based on the criteria mentioned in this case about the logo, which even here indicates that they only accept texts about the logo, which is what is mentioned, and what I want to get to with this is that I dare to say that the main strength that Udemy has is programming courses, therefore this should not be anything new and therefore this should already be a settled matter.
If you say that it was a new technology like astro that just came out a little while ago but you tell me that you still have problems detecting if they are logos or not For technologies as old as the php logo that hasn't changed in a lot of years, the same as the Note or the npm logo, this is already unforgivable, to put it one way, and based on everything mentioned that the main point is feedback, I can attach it with all the videos that I made about udemm, they are basically criticisms that I can summarize as malfunctioning on some aspects of the platform apart from inconsistencies in them, for example to give an inconsistency or what I consider inconsistency since again all this is my opinion, it is about promotional or educational emails that they qualify them in that way and that in summary everything leads to the same thing, which is that these people do not receive feedback and basically work based on what they feel like, you could say or their interests, and in this case this again makes no sense to me, so that was all I wanted to comment to you and nothing more than say see you in another video
- Andrés Cruz
Develop with Laravel, Django, Flask, CodeIgniter, HTML5, CSS3, MySQL, JavaScript, Vue, Android, iOS, Flutter